patching...
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

Will Patrick's $1.9 Billion Tax Hike Pass?

The governor's optimistic but state legislators don't sound so sure. What do you think?

 

 

Governor Deval Patrick's still bullish about his budget proposal, which will raise $1.9 billion in new revenue through an increase in the income tax, decrease in the sales tax, and various other changes to taxes, fees and deductions. But the men and women who have to pass the bill don't sound as eager to support a package many see as a politically-damaging measure.

The Boston Herald quotes several Beacon Hill legislators who sounded notes of caution to outright opposition to the budget. Those quoted cited the 1990 election losses in the wake of an income tax increase, pressure on small businesses and the higher price of gas as reasons they were skeptical. And the governor's new web tools touting proposed transportation and education projects in specific political districts hasn't done much to warm the waters, according to the Herald.

What do you think? Is the governor's budget dead on arrival, or does he have a shot at getting it passed? Would you pass this budget if you were a state senator? Does the state need the additional revenue or should it learn to live with the money it already collects? Tell us your thoughts in the comments below!

Related Topics: Budget, Deval Patrick, and Tax Increase

Rob C.

11:14 am on Friday, March 1, 2013

Hope not. Remove ALL waste from the state before any taxes are increased. Only increase I would be happy to pay for would be for an outside auditing company to come and review the books and recomend cuts that would have to become mandatory cuts.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Tyler Jozefowicz

12:45 am on Saturday, March 2, 2013

The trouble with your recommendation is that you will never be satisfied " that all waste is removed". So your so-called solution is a ruse. Sounds good , but it is a ruse. It's a false perception that most righties harp and live by, to perpetuate your far right mentality. Never satisfied, dude. Never satisfied.

Comment_arrow

Russ

4:21 pm on Monday, March 4, 2013

Tyler needs to provide a demographic profile so we can understand exactly who he is and what benefits he receives. There is always room for cost improvements.

Gail

11:14 am on Friday, March 1, 2013

aren't we being taxed enough . The voters who can least afford tax increases are being affected. Real estate taxes have gone so high along with heating costs that people are being forced from their homes. Seniors, who have supported communities all their lives are really being squeezed. This is so wrong

Reply
Comment_arrow

Southpaw

2:03 pm on Friday, March 1, 2013

Yes, we are being taxed to death, but he doesn't care. No one does. 2 more years of this jerk is scary because a lot of damage can be done in that period of time.

Maureen Vacca

11:17 am on Friday, March 1, 2013

I hope not. In addition to tax increases, it includes the elimination of 44 tax deductions. Under current tax law you can sell your primary residence and not pay capital gains tax...the Gov. wants to eliminate that benefit. Those of us that have built up equity in our homes with the hope of retiring on those funds will get hit hard! He also wants to eliminate the tax deduction for college tuition and health savings accounts. Two of the highest expenses middle-class families have, college education and health insurance costs. Urge your legislator to vote NO.

Reply

jirkyrick

11:35 am on Friday, March 1, 2013

thats because he is pulling a Mayor Howard and the Blue Bags, he is not running for reelection. Do you think he would propose this insane tax increase if he was running again. We need to make sure that all our state reps know we will not vote fo ranyonr that approves this

Reply
Comment_arrow

Bob

1:27 pm on Friday, March 1, 2013

The problem is "we" will. Remember the death penalty? "We" (86%) said we wanted it and if it didn't pass, heads would roll. The next election after defeating it 98% of the idiots were re-elected!
We get what we deserve in this one party state!

Comment_arrow

Tyler Jozefowicz

3:40 pm on Friday, March 1, 2013

Bob: there were no death panels. there are none today. It was a lie. Politifacts deemed it the worst lie of 2010.
More FOX News crap that you parrots repeat.

Comment_arrow

Rob C.

3:55 pm on Friday, March 1, 2013

Tyler,
A little reading comprehension class would be good for you. Bob is refering to the Death PENALTY for criminals, not Death Panels that would have been in a fully socialized health care system, that was not a Fox News thing and was not part of what is now ObamaCare.

Comment_arrow

Bill Kuechly

4:29 pm on Friday, March 1, 2013

Right on Rob, Tyler is your basic "low informaton" voter that pervades this state

Comment_arrow

Joe Veno

8:35 pm on Friday, March 1, 2013

Yea they are also known as Moonbats !

Comment_arrow

Bob

4:58 pm on Saturday, March 2, 2013

Tyler, That is funny! You are so indoctrinated you see death p and go 0 to 60 to DNC talking points! Who is the parrot? ROTFLMAOAY!

Comment_arrow

Ron Powell

12:52 pm on Sunday, March 3, 2013

Bob, sad but true. But Tyler is no different from most liberals. They peruse TPM and Kos, which are, after all, run by Democratic operatives, for all of their information on any issue. They are unable to think critically about any issue. They don't stop to think that not even they apply the pablum they repeat from the Party Operatives in their own personal lives. They have almost ceased being human. Thinking critically and asking questions are very much a part of what makes us human.

Comment_arrow

Russ

4:23 pm on Monday, March 4, 2013

Death panels are currently being staffed ... by those with no expertise and with guidance to minimize health care for the elderly.

Jack Boston

1:23 pm on Friday, March 1, 2013

How about we put all our congressman in jail who violate the voter's referendum to lower the income tax? Maybe would should pass a law that if the voter's pass a law and the congress does not follow through on the law (assuming its constitutionality) then they should go in jail until their term is expired.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Tyler Jozefowicz

8:12 pm on Friday, March 1, 2013

Bill Kuechly: so you're the only smart one and everyone else that does not vote like you is stupid, misinformed?
I like the way all you righties talk about me to one another, sort of a collective delusional therapy session at the institution, reinforcing everyone's mania in the group session.
Last I check Obama won, Elizabeth Warren won, all MA congressmen won, Duval Patrick won, 2 terms, and all the FOX news watchers woke up that Wednesday after the election in shock, after sucking up the FOX propaganda for years.
.

Comment_arrow

Rob C.

8:46 pm on Friday, March 1, 2013

Tyler,
FYI, I watch FOX and CNN and read many different online news sites to get my info. I woke up on TUESDAY knowing that Obama was going to win. Romney was the wrong choice and I did not vote for him or Obama. I voted for Johnson because I did my research on ALL the candidates and what they stand for and decided that Johnson was the best one for my beliefs. My opinion Huntsman should have been the republican choice and he would have destroyed Obama.
I bet you have never researched a single candidate that that you voted for. You just blindly vote for the person with the D next to their name.
You probably even voted for Bump as auditor who was so unqualified for the job that even the Boston Globe couldn’t find it in their far left leaning endorsement board to recommend her for the job.
I was however surprised and disappointed when I woke up on Wednesday morning to discover that the voters of this state voted in Warren. Hands down the most unqualified person for the job. She was hand-picked by Obama to run and the state Democratic Party was so spineless they wouldn’t even allow a primary to be held because that would go against Obama’s personal choice. Had a primary been allowed then we definitely would not have a Senator Warren. Still may not have been Brown but at least it would have been somebody with qualifications for the job.

Comment_arrow

Ron Powell

9:40 pm on Friday, March 1, 2013

"Righties collective, delusional, and manic," says area man who cheerfully, automatically votes Democratic and can't tell the difference between death penalty and death panels.

Comment_arrow

Tyler Jozefowicz

12:55 am on Saturday, March 2, 2013

Hey Rob C: I research and Obama was the best choice for me . You are not the only one that researches, so don't put me down in that respect. Ignorant attitude, dude. The majority of Americans felt the same way by 5 million more than Romney, even though 2 million more probable Obama votes were suppressed. " A little reading comprehension"? Another ignorant remark by you.
Voted for " Johnson"? say what! You and 2 other people? Way to go , Rob. That was a wasted vote. Guess the other 100 million voters were missing something. Weird stuff, dude.

Comment_arrow

Tyler Jozefowicz

9:39 am on Saturday, March 2, 2013

Rob C:Friendly critique. FOX and CNN are petty much the same; you want diversity try MSNBC, so not all your research was done. Ever vote for a democratic presidential candidate - who? Huntsman would not destroy Obama. You recognize that the other 6 or so Republicans were clowns . I pay attention to politics quite closely so your observation is wrong. Think Winslow, Gomez, Sullivan are US senate timber? Hope you do your research there, or the clueless, dogmatic libertarian? warren ran a clean campaign while Brown was cons descending, , anti -women, equal rights , in the pocket of big oil, Wall Street- trace the money. Phony coat and truck; hope you could see through that. there were 4 or 5 other Democrat candidates, there were early debates for US senate. By primary time they all dropped out You were no paying close attention to the DEM side. I liked DeFranco early on against Elizabeth. Right now Ed Markey is the most qualified for the special seat,does have the experience but you will probably come up with another criteria besides experience to rationalize that race. Just my comments . Always like to hear the opposite view.

Comment_arrow

Ron Powell

3:47 pm on Saturday, March 2, 2013

Actually, you got it backwards: the barn coat and truck were real; the Native American heritage and progressive pedigree of Elizabeth Warren were fake. Her family earned nearly a million dollars last year, and gave a paltry 2.8 percent to charitable causes. More of the "do-as-I-say-not-as-I-do" we have come to expect from liberals.

jirkyrick

1:28 pm on Friday, March 1, 2013

Yeh, let the state reps know we wont let Deval go "All Blue Bag" on us. they will vote it donw if they hear from the public, email, phone calls, tweet etc.

Reply

Southpaw

2:01 pm on Friday, March 1, 2013

There are no words for me to describe how I despise this person. Raising taxes on everyone (we're all hurting in some way) for his useless pet project...because that's all this is. Now he wants to lower sales tax? Oh, right...because the garbage on welfare, sucking off of the taxpayers, pay sales tax but not income tax. So raise income tax and lower sales tax. Another break for the lazy. Where's the break for the working person supporting this trash? How about creating job to collect more in taxes instead? I'd like to put this guy in a helicopter.....I shouldn't have to explain the rest.

Reply
Comment_arrow

AHM

2:50 pm on Friday, March 1, 2013

No helicopter, we are going to put him in the white house. If you invest in stocks I would suggest buy from the makers of prozac.

Comment_arrow

Dan

3:02 pm on Friday, March 1, 2013

Southpaw, lower income tax is a break for the working person... Sales tax is a regressive tax when compared to total income, as the lower and middle classes are going to spend a much higher percentage of their income as opposed to the wealthy. It also, in theory, promotes increased economic activity, especialy in towns close to the new hampshire border.

Comment_arrow

webmom

7:10 pm on Friday, March 1, 2013

I totally agree with you Southpaw...I feel the same way. And its so frustrating because there is absolutely nothing we can do about it. People comment on blogs, etc., but they keep voting the same people in. When I first heard of these 'suggestions'...I was shocked and scared.

Comment_arrow

Tyler Jozefowicz

8:49 pm on Saturday, March 2, 2013

Ron Powell: bottom line you lost; your cheap shots here won't change that. Best I can see from the Righties here is that everyone else is uninformed. Need to get into charitable giving , checkoffs on applications 30 years ago. Sad.
difference : Senator Warren did not need to get into that sideshow stuff. brownie on the otherhand was pushing his gimmicks. The People saw through him and sent him packing to FOX News where all the Republican losers get sent.

Comment_arrow

Ron Powell

1:10 pm on Sunday, March 3, 2013

Tyler, I would argue that we all lost. By next year, perhaps half of Massachusetts residents, including many in the middle class, are going to be hit with the Obamacare Cadillac tax, and one Senatorial candidate was uniquely positioned to work with Democratic and Republican Senators to protect the middle class here in Massachusetts while the other Senatorial candidate is a polarizing demagogue who will do nothing to protect the middle class from this tax.

I am sure that you have a talking point about Fox News or death panels or risk pools that you will throw out as a non sequitur, but the bottom line is that the middle class here in Massachusetts is going to pay the Cadillac tax while Elizabeth Warren smiles and tells Massachusetts voters how great the Affordable Healthcare act is for Massachusetts.

Steven Sadowski

2:23 pm on Friday, March 1, 2013

This is a one party state. People have in effect elected an oligarchy who do as they wish, vote as they wish, act as they wish. I'm actually surprised when a pol is caught doing something unethical, that more don't just stay in office instead of resigning. I mean look at Lantigua, Wilkerson and Turner. They got caught, but rode out the storm and their constituents LOVE them. Finneran, DiMasi, Cahill, Murray, the list goes on and on, yet the people of this state just check the "d" box. It's really sad but MA is going to have to get really bad for there to be any change which means a lot of suffering before the Obots in this state will vote outside their party. Look at how bad Detroit is and they still vote Dem there. Chicago, DC, Philly, the list goes on.

Reply

Bob TB

2:57 pm on Friday, March 1, 2013

Those who voted for Deval and his friends are getting what they deserve. Only in Massachusetts can a person lie about being a minority and win an election.

Reply
Comment_arrow

webmom

7:07 pm on Friday, March 1, 2013

But Bob TB, it's not just the people that voted for him that 'get what they deserve'..what about those that didn't? They're getting stuck with all this too! I think the people that voted him in WANT lower sales tax and higher income tax specifically as Southpaw stated above.

Comment_arrow

AHM

7:49 pm on Friday, March 1, 2013

I hate to correct you but they also lie about how much good they are going to do for us. I love that Judge Judy saying for teenagers, I think it applies to most pols. How do you know they are lying? Their lips are moving. So much money on education wasted on some.

Comment_arrow

Tyler Jozefowicz

10:14 pm on Monday, March 4, 2013

Bob TB: first of all there was no lie. Second, the Massachusetts voters would rather concentrate on issues that effect them ; they did , and voted for Senator Warren over the pretty boy. You really think a phony , fabricated heritage issue would carry the day? issues count over coats, trucks, autographs and hand shaking outside a Bruins game.

Comment_arrow

Brandon

10:25 pm on Monday, March 4, 2013

Usually the politicians wait til they are in office to lie. She came out of the gate doing it. Good job Massachusetts.

Steven McGinley

6:48 pm on Friday, March 1, 2013

This too much waste and we certainly don't get our money's worth from mass highway and the contractors we pay for these highway projects. But take it from them not for me. Let's grab as much of the cash as we can for our new Taj Mahal high school

Reply

Mike G.

8:39 pm on Friday, March 1, 2013

And we wonder why nothing gets done...

Reply

Uncle Sam

11:26 pm on Friday, March 1, 2013

Tax and spend! Tax and spend!

Reply
Comment_arrow

Tyler Jozefowicz

12:57 am on Saturday, March 2, 2013

Uncle: so Republicans spend and charge. Everything is free , man. Let's not spend anything and live under a rock like you.

Robert L Homeyer

4:07 am on Saturday, March 2, 2013

Taxes are high enough and I do not wish to pay any more. I hope they all vote against it. They need to cut spending.

Reply

John

8:06 am on Saturday, March 2, 2013

Rob is right, an outside auditor would be a good idea. Most of the D voters either work for the state or public sector or they have no clue about the wasteful spending that goes on in the public sector. I work for a small municipal town Job and see it every day. We joke that if we were a private company, we would be out of business! Just like the Post Office, lol..

Reply

AHM

8:43 am on Saturday, March 2, 2013

I worked in a government job as a second for 3 years and yes it is incredible the waste of money and resources. It does not mean anything to them. So I know the money is there if people were doing their job starting from the bottom to the top. Just when are they going to start?

Reply

Chris Daley

12:35 pm on Saturday, March 2, 2013

Unions, mob, patronage, favors, cover ups, turf wars, duplication, lies, priviliges, masks, excuses, the cold reserve, calculating approval, anger, hostility, rush hour, welfare, layoffs, aggression, "get out of my way" with a lot of salt, rust, crowding and a dreary climate is what we pay for. My car insurance went up with no issues too?

Reply

rm

1:34 pm on Saturday, March 2, 2013

When this state government answers the people for EBT abuse, welfare fraud, sec8 handouts, healthcare fraud, I will understand the need for higher taxes..All they want is more money to give away to people who understand and work the system for a free ride.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Who Me?

2:19 pm on Saturday, March 2, 2013

Amen to that...7.6 Million a month in fraud and waste..
Hey Coupe Deville...here's some easy cash if you you feel like chasing it.
Otherwise get your slimy hands outta my pockets..

http://freebeacon.com/widespread-welfare-fraud-in-massachusetts/

Tellitlikeitis

3:17 pm on Saturday, March 2, 2013

this is why these out of staters,move here to MA. like deval patrick-from chicago and elizabeth pocahauntus-from oklahoma.they have to move either here or california to get elected.cause no other states that think correctly would vote for these loons,and they know it.

Reply

Wind Dummy 25

8:28 pm on Saturday, March 2, 2013

Poster board for corruptions out of control,
I taste bile every time I hear some BS tying to justifying income tax increases on working people...They may have sounded a little reasonable with sales tax increases. I would have no part of either and have let my Reps know many X's...You have to be a completely droned out not to see the strangling waste.
I have no more $$'s left for this...
Nothing NOTHING, name me SOMETHING, left in DP's flotsam that has upgraded anything or anyone situation. Please mention EBT.

I can't believe Tyler implied MSNBC was reputable, unwatchable.
Former Private now 30 years later, Colonel Brown, was the only person in that race who actually can wear the coat and drive the truck...Liz & her peeps actually capitalized on misfortunes then took peoples homes for pennies on the dollar, coats and trucks and flipped them for cash... Courageous...
Look at the person Tyler before you fall for that ...Aren't you better than that...Really?... Think Independent, and make these people work for your trust you deserve nothing better. Or are you that satisfied. I bet you 9 bucks your not.
Let's get that Brown sh@t straight...He did more in a short time than any Senator did in that city.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Tyler Jozefowicz

9:02 pm on Saturday, March 2, 2013

Wind Dummy25: you probably think FOX NEWS is" fair and balanced", right? MSNBC is there to counter the right wing crap coming from FOX nonstop, compliments of dirty trick artist, Roger Ailes.
Disagree? Let me know.
Brown did nothing , copied a few job bills from Obama, voted not to repeal oil subsidies, voted against the Fair Pay Act for women, bragged about depriving 32 million uninsured Americans a chance to get affordable ( not free) healthcare, watered down the Finance Reform Act so now you rather than the banks pay for its enforcement, went along with every filibuster the Republicans chose to shut down the government. Guy was terrible. The " I fold the laundry at home " ad, was the most laughable. Not the brightest bulb on the tree. You would probably suck up to him and ask him for his autograph.

Uncle Sam

9:49 pm on Saturday, March 2, 2013

I'm not a Republican. Our government has us on the road to ruin. Bush spent too much and cut taxes (cutting taxes is a good idea). Obama is spending to much and is raising taxes. Both bad ideas. This country does not have a revenue problem, it has a spending problem.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Tyler Jozefowicz

10:27 pm on Saturday, March 2, 2013

Uncle: the last statement is a talking point. The way to solve it is a balanced approach to fine tune both expenditures and revenue. Obama spending too much? Most of the recent spending is carryover still from the Bush years- wars not paid, prescription drug plan not paid, Bush tax cuts that reduced a trillion from revenue still going, recession that reduced tax revenue. Obama spent on a Stimulus that was half tax cuts. name some other large Obama spending initiatives. There are none. spending initiates with US house of representatives. Obama does not spend a dime.

Comment_arrow

Robert L Homeyer

8:22 am on Sunday, March 3, 2013

Tyler - You state Obama does not spend a dime? He and his cronies have increased the use of food stamps by over 40%. The Community Organizer who is more head of the Democratic Party than President, is using the office to give a way money. Obama phone is not a joke...it is happening. The country is broke and this nit wit who has never had to pay for anything in his whole life just whines and does nothing. We need someone to lead the country.

Wind Dummy 25

10:19 pm on Saturday, March 2, 2013

Didn't mention Fox news, you did I could care less ...I do enjoy O'Reilly's show now and then he's pretty entertaining.
So MSNBC is a counter show? To Fox? I thought it was a serious news station. My mistake i get that now, it's not in Fox's league. I don't follow either enough if that's what your getting at. To busy working, or deploying.
Many others also apparently do I checked this out out of curiosity when I read your post. http://www.mediabistro.com/tvnewser/category/ratings
I'm more of a sports guy, when I watch the TV.
Take it easy Tyler it's just a show. Isn't it? Besides I was really into blasting DP. and his tax crap...Sorry I mentioned Brown. I'm sure Liz will be fine. If not she gets voted out also right? Or are you that guy that votes like the rest? Always happy no matter what.
BTW the markets will untimely decide how business goes. Who survives who gets paid what or not. You produce or your gone It's talent that makes the difference. Not Washingmachine DC not even Beacon Hill.
Not Brown or Liz or DP.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Tyler Jozefowicz

10:34 pm on Saturday, March 2, 2013

Wind: agree on that last part.
MSNBC does not apologize for being left of center. It is serious , never said it was not.
MSNBC is left bias, FOX is right bias. Disagree? Difference FOX will not admit it. Reading the "FOX Effect " right now. describes in detail how FOX fronts for the Republican party and its candidates . FOX breeches the line between journalism and propaganda , my take.
free market cannot cope with China and India who get a little help from their government , and sorry to say because of that will win out in the end, just being real hear.

Wind Dummy 25

6:13 pm on Sunday, March 3, 2013

When I need the news Tyler, I need to look around, gather what I can then figure it out. Mostly independent news sources. Opinion, on line, etc. National news is now a shame. Ratings and glitz.
It's very easy to gather lintel from all sorts of national media. Most is hog washed slant.
If you need facts you must rely on your own ability to rewash this poor excuse for media. I have never in my life seen media as corrupt as what goes for reporting.
At the very least these so called scoops could try to make someone sweat, anyone in that White House. When I see big toothy grins I tune out. I know what's not coming...Relevant questions.
What weirds me out lately is, if they don't get what they for rebuttal, outlets such as NBC just alter it as they please and put out as news? What's worse than that? Insulting and dangerous.

Reply

stevieB

7:11 am on Monday, March 4, 2013

U seem to forget tbat under Obama we are now a country of freeloaders..they are the majority..people like Tyler take take and take...never pay in..sit at home on their Xbox..on some sort of meds..their vote good as yours..unemployment for 2 years..food stamps for every lard butt..its a joke..only get worse...I just laugh..no mote charity giving from me..none..getting mine..and I sleep well at night..if u don't want to work..no worries..deval and Barry will take care of u..haha hey no one to blame but ourselves..we saw these clowns for what they were but in name of diversity we voted them in..getting theirs now..too bad for u.

Reply
Comment_arrow

J.R.

8:39 am on Monday, March 4, 2013

StevieB, You may be interested to know that only approximately 7/10 of 1% of the federal budget is spent on TANF (welfare benefits).

SNAP (formerly known as Food Stamps) takes approximately 5% of the federal budget.

There are indeed large numbers of people who pay no federal income tax. But those numbers include the working poor (who by definition are not freeloaders), retired public employees, some fairly large, very profitable corporations, elderly people, people with disabilities and so on.

There are always people who will "game the system," but they are not the majority of people.

Also, these programs have been in place since long before Governor Patrick or President Obama ever were elected.

http://voices.washingtonpost.com/ezra-klein/2010/08/research_desk_tallies_how_expe.html

http://www.cbpp.org/cms/index.cfm?fa=view&id=3505

Comment_arrow

Tyler Jozefowicz

10:27 pm on Monday, March 4, 2013

stevieB: " People like Tyler take..."? I work , dude. None of your junk applies.
Speaking of takers , mean the 47% Romney takers? Include Social Security and Medicare, military pensions, corporate welfare. business lunches as a tax deduction. steak and scotch for you businessmen? If you don't never get to the 47%.
Agree, though, scrutinize the stamps. Unfortunate part is the 75% on medicaid are kids 12 and under. Orphanages? willing to pay for foster care and orphanages?
Follow through on your logic. Heard the complaints for decades , with no intelligent next steps. let's hear some without going off subject too much, stevie.

Chris

8:49 am on Monday, March 4, 2013

Put a dollar amount on your percentages.

Reply
Comment_arrow

J.R.

2:26 pm on Monday, March 4, 2013

According to the CBPP (Center on Budget and Policy Priorities):

"Under TANF, the federal government gives states a fixed block grant totaling $16.5 billion each year and requires them to maintain a certain level of state spending (totaling $10 billion-11 billion a year), based on a state’s level of spending for AFDC and related programs prior to its conversion to TANF in 1996. (This state funding requirement is known as the “maintenance of effort” requirement, or MOE.)"

http://www.cbpp.org/cms/index.cfm?fa=view&id=3808

And:

"In fiscal year 2011, the federal government spent about $78 billion on SNAP. About 92 percent went directly to benefits that households used to purchase food. The remaining 8 percent was used primarily for state administrative costs, including eligibility determinations, employment and training and nutrition education for SNAP households, and anti-fraud activities."

http://www.cbpp.org/cms/index.cfm?fa=view&id=2226

According to the Heritage Foundation, "total federal spending for fiscal year 2012[1] reached $3.6 trillion."

http://www.heritage.org/research/reports/2012/10/federal-spending-by-the-numbers-2012

For future reference, it is polite to say "please" when you ask someone to do something. Your post looks more like an order than a request.

Comment_arrow

Brandon

9:34 pm on Monday, March 4, 2013

Winddummy has the legit numbers

Wind Dummy 25

4:15 pm on Monday, March 4, 2013

Jr & spenders in arms, your itemizing single low % quotes are so innocuous?
More than half of the Fed budget in 2012 went to entitlements.
My lord Memories...
If you like charts & graphs, you won't want to look at this disaster...
I recall reset talk back to the Clinton days, but if you peek back your eyebrows will pop off. Those years were so exciting as Bubba just blew some smoke, borrowed out of other Fed funds, employee funds etc. Then his peeps set the table for the bank/Real Estate debacle. All the while claiming good times.
If you all recall Bush ran and was elected evoking fiscal calm and did halt the Clinton recession 00-01. Employment soared and taxes were better than reasonable to services rendered. defense held it's own and was maintained. Gas at $2.00 sucked but better than $4.00 per. Balance reachable.
Discretionary defense moved higher in 03 wars etc. But never ran past 28%.
Federal spending per household reached $29,691 in 2012, a 29 percent increase (adjusted for inflation) from $23,010 in 2002. The government collected $20,293 per household in taxes in 2012.
With these stats in mind, + planning on inevitable explosive inflation and dwindling dollar to print-spend, just raising taxes alone won't even allow for a tip after these insane entitlement gorge fests.

http://www.heritage.org/research/reports/2012/10/federal-spending-by-the-numbers-2012
Sources: Office of Management and Budget, Budget of the U.S. Government, FY 2013: Historical Tables,

Reply
Comment_arrow

J.R.

4:25 pm on Monday, March 4, 2013

My original post was in response to Stevie B's post asserting that "most" Americans are "freeloaders."

It has been my experience that when people refer to "freeloaders" they aren't talking about retirees drawing on the Social Security system that they have paid into, Medicare recipients, or the large corporations accepting tax dollars for any of a number of questionable reasons. They are talking about TANF and SNAP recipients. There is a real misperception that entitlement funding is primarily used for those two programs. I was simply trying to prove that that is not true.

I offered data from the CBPP and the Heritage Foundation to support my assertion.

Wind Dummy 25

5:20 pm on Monday, March 4, 2013

I'm hip JR...And it's all good thanks, but really with all these hands double scarfing from the pot, it has emptied the average tax paying suckers resolve to supply enable anymore, and for what...Eventual even higher taxes, lower quality of living, lower buying power, stupid high fuel prices, bankruptcy, hopelessness etc. That's that European model bizz bomb waiting to explode.
Shutting down the Machine my be the best thing to happen in years.
There are plenty of jobs out there. As you know you can average over $30.00 per hour tax free, why would you want to get out of the cart and push. Especially if you've been brought up that way. The system has been corrupted and abused.
My kids find this unacceptable. Yours to probably.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Tyler Jozefowicz

10:37 pm on Monday, March 4, 2013

Wind: what is the $30 an hour tax free . There are plenty of $7/hour minimum wage jobs in the service industry. Explain the $30 you referenced . maybe if the minimum wage was made a living wage , a lot would opt for work rather than welfare. If on the other hand , it's everyone for themselves , just say so. Most on welfare are kids, disabled, elderly in nursing homes. Dukakis took able bodied males off the roles decades ago. lower the Title 8s and Food Stamps , BUT eliminate the corporate loopholes and wealthy deductions, up the minimum wage . Deal?

Wind Dummy 25

11:01 pm on Monday, March 4, 2013

I'm in the middle of a long lengthy report for my business, but I will send you this Tyler.
Be it known by me anyway, I and many I know in business, do not support corporate welfare. I'll DEAL when the intensives for business to employ and we are able have to offer skilled workers employment and hire freely, returns again?
That is a slippery slope BTW. Do not confuse entry level wages with minimum wage. It's a loser of an idea. Ask any kid looking for part time work this summer. Or college interns looking to begin their careers.
And if you look at the situation a little closer. Someone didn't get the Dukes memo.

It's official. Taxpayers are no longer simply helping the poor, they're subsidizing the lives of welfare recipients at a better rate than their own. The Senate Budget Committee has released a report showing households living below the poverty line and receiving welfare payments are raking in the equivalent of $168 per day in benefits which come in the form of food stamps, housing, childcare, healthcare and more. The median household income in 2011 was $50,054, totaling $137.13 per day. The worst part? Welfare payments are equivalent to making $30 per hour for 40 hours a week. The median wage for non-welfare recipients is $25 per hour but because they pay taxes, unlike welfare recipients, the wage is bumped down to $21 per hour. From the report:
http://townhall.com/tipsheet/katiepavlich/2012/12/07/poor_households_getting_168_in_welfare_per_day_from_taxpayers

Reply

Leave a comment