This post was contributed by a community member. The views expressed here are the author's own.

Politics & Government

Agree With Gov. Patrick Signing the Three Strikes Bill?

Patrick had two options: sign the bill without the amendment or veto the entire thing.

Gov. Deval Patrick set in motion a wave of criticism when he proposed an amendment to the "three strikes"/Melissa's Bill on the grounds that it lacked sufficient provisions for judicial discretion. 

Dubbed "Melissa's Law," after Melissa Gosule, the 27-year-old Jamaica Plain schoolteacher who was raped and murdered in 1999 by a felon who had 27 previous convictions, the bill eliminates parole for someone convicted three times of one of 40 or so violent crimes, with at least one conviction having carried a minimum three-year prison term. It was was .

Warning of possible unintended "unjust consequences" that can arise from mandatory sentencing laws, Patrick wrote in a letter to the Legislature, "None of us is wise or prescient enough to foresee each and every circumstance in which the new habitual offender provisions may apply." 

Find out what's happening in Melrosewith free, real-time updates from Patch.

Although the bill passed with overwhelming support in both chambers last week, Patrick sent it back on Saturday, asking for an amendment that increases judicial discretion. But both , rejecting the amendment and putting it back on Patrick's desk as is—and thereby forcing Patrick to make an all-or-nothing choice.

On Tuesday, . With this in mind, tell us how you think Gov. Patrick should've acted by voting in this poll. We welcome you to explain your choice in the comments section, too. 

Find out what's happening in Melrosewith free, real-time updates from Patch.

We’ve removed the ability to reply as we work to make improvements. Learn more here

The views expressed in this post are the author's own. Want to post on Patch?